🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are considering parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to enact a law lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good starting point," said the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a blanket age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and fit for minors," said a influential peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to follow this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that states around the world are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.